Every Child
Has Two Parents
Goto CRN Japan Home 日本語 Español
Français Italiano
한국어
 Help Now...
list bullet Find My Parent
list bullet Child Abduction
list bullet Child Custody
list bullet Child Visitation
list bullet Marriage
list bullet Divorce
list bullet Adoption
list bullet Citizenship
list bullet Abuse
list bullet Prevention
 News
list bullet Personal Stories
list bullet Published Articles
list bullet Success Stories
list bullet Upcoming Events
list bullet Message Boards
Google



 Law
list bullet Japanese Law
list bullet Common Legal Forms
list bullet Your Rights In Japan
list bullet International Treaties
list bullet Non-Japanese Law
list bullet Discrimination
 Resources
list bullet Lawyers
list bullet Counseling
list bullet Private Investigators
list bullet Other Organizations
list bullet Parental Alientaion Syndrome
list bullet Translation
 CRN Japan
list bullet About Us
list bullet Our Issues
list bullet Membership
list bullet Get Involved
list bullet Donations

visit counter
Visitors

Foreigners' constitutional right to trial is violated by visa denial or deportation

A foreigner may not be able to get a visa to stay in Japan to continue in a family law trial.

  • Discrimination against awarding visas while involved in a Family Court or related legal dispute

 The most basic issue is that a non-Japanese needs to be able to stay in the country long enough to pursue legal action for custody or visitation rights.  Since this can takes years in Japanese courts, this requires the ability to work and earn a living.  Yet there is no visa status that allows this.   There have also been cases where the Japanese parent has contacted and "discouraged" employers who might otherwise hire the non-Japanese citizen legally.  (Not having this type of visa can also encourage foreign parents to re-abduct the child out of Japan.  It can also encourage foreign parents to stay or work in Japan illegally.)

Rapid deportation policy, while not directly a family law problem, illustrates the extent to which Japan disrespects this constitutional right to a trial.  ??Is this another KOKUMIN only right???

From Feb 2, 2006 raid deportation article: work into the text here:

In 2005, a revision to the Administrative Litigation Law extended the statute of limitations for filing that kind of suit from three to six months from the time of the original decision.

The revision was made to "properly secure the opportunities for Japanese people to restore their rights or interests" should those be damaged by government actions.

But Immigration Bureau officials apparently believe that those rights do not apply to foreign nationals.

"(We) cannot allow foreigners who have overstayed their visas to remain in Japan for such a long period, even if they plan to file litigation," said a senior official of the bureau's enforcement division.

"We do not believe we violated foreigners' rights to file lawsuits," the official added. "They could have prepared for filing lawsuits before they were notified of the ministry's rejection of their application, or consulted their lawyers within the day."

Solutions We Want To See

  • TBD

Documented Cases

Articles