|
|
A non-custodial parent may not be able to get a visa to stay and work in Japan to maintain a relationship with their child
For the majority of parents, the only practical way to maintain personal relations and direct contact with a child living
in Japan, is to also live and work in Japan. Thus this demands relaxed immigration requirements for non-custodial parents
of Japanese children.
Additionally, a parent living overseas may be denied a visa simply to enter the Japan to see his child or to attend court
proceedings in relation to his or her child.
Solutions We Want To See
- Amend immigration laws so that a foreign parent of a Japanese child can qualify for a residency visa, either long term
or permanent residency, without the letter of guarantee currently required for the granting of such visas. This should
apply towards a spouse visa, a non-custodial parent of a Japanese child visa, or permanent residency for any parent of a
Japanese child.
- Amend immigration laws so that a non-married or non-custodial foreign parent of a Japanese child qualifies for a long-term residency visa
permitting employment. In particular, sustaining the non-Japanese parent and living in the same country as his or her
Japanese child should be an acceptable reason to grant a long term residency visa, even if that parent is not the custodial
parent.
- Amend immigration laws so that a non-married or non-custodial foreign parent of a Japanese child qualifies for
permanent residency under the same accelerated time frame and favorable conditions as the spouse of a Japanese citizen.
- Barring documented national security concerns, immigration regulations should explicitly permit a non-custodial parent
to enter Japan to get a visa to attend court proceedings regarding his or her child.
- Barring documented national security concerns, immigration regulations should explicitly permit a non-custodial parent
to enter Japan to get a visa to visit his or her child several times per year.
Documented Cases
Articles
- International Marriages in Japan: Part Two – Impact of 17 October 2002 Supreme Court decision on International Marriages; J. Sean Curtin
(Professor, Japanese Red Cross University); October 28, 2002. The Supreme Court issued its first decision on the visa status of a non-Japanese spouse married to a Japanese citizen.
Over ruling the Osaka High Court, the Supreme Court said that a marriage must be viable and ongoing, and if the Japanese spouse commits a misdeed, such as infidelity to break up the marriage, the foreign spouse may legally be deprived of his or
her spouse visa. (cached copy)
- See this petition that will soon be put out to support legal changes to prevent spouse and child abuse. It has a concise explanation of the connections.
-
Yamila Castellanos: “I know that I
will recover my daughter.”; Cosas.com; April 15, 2005. (original
Spanish) Recounts Yamila's story including details before the abductions. Tells that she had to leave Japan
because she was denied a visa, even though she was participating in a legal battle in court. (cached
copy)
-
Getting custody
of kids after divorce; Japan Today; October 11, 2004. A letter by Terrie Lloyd about the problems of not
being able to see your children in Japan and international divorce. Mentions that this may be accompanied by the parent
losing their visa and the problem of forging applications for Divorce by Mutual Consent. (cached
copy)
-
When Children Get
Caught Up In Separation; Eye-Ai, Eye
On Society; June 4, 2004. This article was partially based on interviews with Mark Smith, and so
contains information on a variety of issues including lack of visitation, not signing the Hague Convention on International
Parental Abduction, need for a Parent of Japanese Child visa, and Yamila's case. Includes some Ministry of Health
Labor and Welfare statistics on international divorces and children born out of wedlock.
-
Gaijin dad deported to Pakistan ahead of trial date; United for a Multicultural Japan;
Date : June 4, 2001. A Press Release decrying the sudden and secret deportation of Ken Massey, who as a result, will not be able to proceed with his lawsuit against Japan Immigration for his detention, which was scheduled for a hearing in about
six weeks.
-
Father's plight raises immigration policy questions;
Japan Times;
March 17, 2001. Discusses detention of Ken Massey, a 17 year law abiding citizen of Japan with two Japanese children and the law suit he is planning against Japan Immigration. (cached copy)
-
Lost In A Loophole: Foreigners
Who Are on the Losing End of a Custody Battle in Japan Don't Have Much Recourse; Los Angeles Times, September 19, 1996.
Stories of Walter Benda, David Brian Thomas, Dale Martin and Charles Talley. Describes
how lack of a "parent of Japanese child" visa gives an abducting spouse power, how a hanko can be used for fogery, and
quotes a Japanese Foreign Ministry official on why Japan does not need to sign the Hague Convention on International
Parental Abduction.
|