Every Child
Has Two Parents
Goto CRN Japan Home 日本語 Español
Français Italiano
한국어
 Help Now...
list bullet Find My Parent
list bullet Child Abduction
list bullet Child Custody
list bullet Child Visitation
list bullet Marriage
list bullet Divorce
list bullet Adoption
list bullet Citizenship
list bullet Abuse
list bullet Prevention
 News
list bullet Personal Stories
list bullet Published Articles
list bullet Success Stories
list bullet Upcoming Events
list bullet Message Boards
Google



 Law
list bullet Japanese Law
list bullet Common Legal Forms
list bullet Your Rights In Japan
list bullet International Treaties
list bullet Non-Japanese Law
list bullet Discrimination
 Resources
list bullet Lawyers
list bullet Counseling
list bullet Private Investigators
list bullet Other Organizations
list bullet Parental Alientaion Syndrome
list bullet Translation
 CRN Japan
list bullet About Us
list bullet Our Issues
list bullet Membership
list bullet Get Involved
list bullet Donations

visit counter
Visitors

Possible Criminal Penalties in Japan for Parental Abduction To Japan

In 2000, the police arrested Engle Nieman, the father of a child with a Japanese woman. He was trying to leave the country with her. According to the article "Marbury v. Madison and The Matrix: What Child Custody and Visitation in Japan Show us about the Japanese Court System," written by a western lawyer fluent in Japanese, the police arrested Mr. Nieman for the crime of Abduction or Enticement for Purposes of Removing from Japan (nihon kokugo iso- mokuteki ryakushu oyobi yu-kai). This is a violation of Article 226(1) of the Penal Code, a pre-war law "originally intended to prevent prostitution" by preventing minors from being transported overseas.  Engle. Nieman's conviction was confirmed by the Supreme Court of Japan in 2003.  (Something we regard as a bad decision by a Japanese court, to say the least.)

In 2000, it seems that Article 226 of the Penal Code applied only if you removed the person FROM JAPAN. (And perhaps only for the purpose of prostitution, at least until the law was used against Engle Nieman who was not likely trying to remove his own daughter from Japan for prostitution.) But on June 22, 2005, Article 226 of the Japanese Penal Code was changed, such that "removing a person from the country they are in" is now a crime, regardless of whether or not that country was Japan.  The list of recent changes to this law (cached copy) as well as the updated version of the changed articles (cached copy) can be found on the Ministry of Justice website in the respective links in this sentence.  The entire Penal Code - Chapter 33 - Crimes of Kidnapping, Abduction and Human Trafficking is also available on this site.  The following table summarizes the relevant changes made in Jun 2005.

Although this law may have originally been changed to appease the international community about Japan getting tough on international trafficking of women for prostitution, it is possible that you could apply it to parental kidnapping also, using the Engle Nieman case as a precedent.  Note that your child would have to have been abducted after the changes on June 22, 2005.  The advantage in this is that you can get the police involved immediately and begin prosecuting for a crime, without having to get the Family Courts involved.  The negative is of course that you would need a Japanese prosecutor and the police to agree.

For people trying to prevent a Japanese parent from abducting their child out of another country back to Japan, a criminal penalty like this is an additional threat.  Without this, there are only civil penalties, which as we know, Japanese courts cannot enforce.  Print out the Penal Code - Chapter 33 - Crimes of Kidnapping, Abduction and Human Trafficking and bring it in to Japanese embassies in your area. Write down the name of whomever you talk to.  Better yet, bring a tape recorder and record the conversation. Inform them of your intent to prosecute anyone who helps their child leave your country, in violation of a court order for custody or a restraining order against travel.  This is something you can prosecute for in Japan, rather than in the foreign country where the consular officer may have diplomatic immunity.

Finally, note that the Supreme Court recently made a decision based partially on Article 224, such that "Where the father took away by physical force his two-year-old child who was in the custody of the mother living separately from him, if there were no special circumstances in which it was actually necessary for the father to commit such an act and the act was violent and coercive, the father's act of kidnapping the child cannot be justified even though he has parental authority." If this can be used inside Japan, perhaps it can be used in conjunction with Article 226 for kidnappings outside Japan also.

To learn more about the status quo - not treating parental kidnapping as a crime and especially not international parental kidnapping, please see Parental Kidnapping is not considered a crime in Japan, in particular when it is done by Japanese citizens.

Please report back to webmaster of any success or failure so we can advise others.

Article English translation (unofficial by CRN Japan list member) Original Japanese (from houko.com Penal Code Section)
224

 

MODIFIED

(Abduction and Kidnapping of a Minor) -- ORIGINAL

Article 224-- A person who abducts or kidnaps a minor is subject to imprisonment for a period of more than three months and less than 5 years.

(未成年者略取及び誘拐)

第224条未成年者を略取し、又は誘拐した者は、3月以上年以下の懲役に処する。

(Abduction and Kidnapping of a Minor) - MODIFIED

Article 224-- A person who abducts or kidnaps a minor is subject to imprisonment for a period of more than three months and less than 7 years.

(未成年者略取及び誘拐)

第224条未成年者を略取し、又は誘拐した者は、3月以上7年以下の懲役に処する。

226 (1)

 

MODIFIED

(Abduction and Kidnapping for the Purpose of Transfer Outside the Country of Japan in Which They Are Located) -- ORIGINAL

Article 226-- A person who abducts or kidnaps a person with the objective of transporting that person outside the country of Japan in which that person is located is subject to penal servitude for a period of more than two years.

[Although this does not specifically talk about a "minor" it was used in the Engle Nieman case, which definitely involved a minor, and the decision was approved by the Supreme Court, so this should be applicable to parental kidnapping.]

(所在日本国外移送目的略取及び誘拐)

第226条 所在日本国外に移送する目的で、人を略取し、又は誘拐した者は、2年以上の有期懲役に処する。

(Abduction and Kidnapping for the Purpose of Transfer Outside the Country in Which They Are Located) -- MODIFIED

Article 226-- A person who abducts or kidnaps a person with the objective of transporting that person outside the country in which that person is located is subject to penal servitude for a period of more than two years.

(所在国外移送目的略取及び誘拐)

第226条 所在国外に移送する目的で、人を略取し、又は誘拐した者は、2年以上の有期懲役に処する。

226 (2)

 

ADDED

(Human Trafficking  lit: Buying And Selling People)

Article 226 Clause 2-- A person who buys another person is subject to penal servitude of at least 3 months and no more than 5 years.

2) A person who buys a minor is subject to penal servitude of at least 3 months but no more than 7 years.

3) <Something about committing violence. TBD>

4)  A person who sells another person is subject to the same penalties as in the previous sub-clause.

5) A person who buys or sells a person with the objective of transporting that person outside the country in which that person is located is subject to penal servitude for a period of more than two years.

Note that sub-clause 5 is separate from clause 1, which does not require you to buy or sell a person.  This may be an argument that Clause 1 does not require the intent of buying and selling or prostitution.

(人身売買)

第226条の2 人を買い受けた者は、3月以上5年以下の懲役に処する。

2 未成年者を買い受けた者は、3月以上7年以下の懲役に処する。

3 営利、わいせつ、結婚又は生命若しくは身体に対する加害の目的で、人を買い受けた者は、1年以上10年以下の懲役に処する。

4 人を売り渡した者も、前項と同様とする。

5 所在国外に移送する目的で、人を売買した者は、2年以上の有期懲役に処する。

226 (3)

 

ADDED

(Person Who Transports Another Person Outside the Country in Which They Are Located)

Article 226 Clause 3-- A person who transports and abducted, kidnapped or bought/sold person outside the country which they located in  is subject to penal servitude for a period of more than two years.

(被略取者等所在国外移送)

第226条の3 略取され、誘拐され、又は売買された者を所在国外に移送した者は、2年以上の有期懲役に処する。

 


The information on this website concerns a matter of public interest, and is provided for educational and informational purposes only in order to raise public awareness of issues concerning left-behind parents. Unless otherwise indicated, the writers and translators of this website are not lawyers nor professional translators, so be sure to confirm anything important with your own lawyer.
 Last modified: May 01, 2007 Copyright © 2003-2006 Contact us 
 URL of this page is http://www.crnjapan.com//japan_law/en/penalcode226.html