JAPAN AS A HAVEN FOR CHILD ABDUCTION
- North Korea is Not Japan's Only Abduction Scandal -
Speech: Hideaki Tanaka (President of Fathers’ Website)
/(and other speech by CRC Japan)
●●● 15:00-16:30, Mar 11 (Thu), 2004 / at FCCJ (Yurakucho,
Tokyo)●●●
Divorce rates are rising in Japan. There were 2.3 divorces
per thousand people in 2002 (MHLW statistics), which is comparable to rates in
other developed countries, and about 300,000 Japanese children were involved. In
Japan, however, there are no joint custody laws, only sole custody. Also,
visitation rights are not stipulated in any laws, so there are many cases in
which parents with no custody rights after divorce are kept from seeing their
own children. Out of all the G8 and developed countries of the world,
Japan is virtually the only country that does not have joint custody or
visitation rights.
This injustice has lead to one of the biggest tragedies in
Japanese family law history; the Osaka abuse case discovered in January. This
tragedy could have been avoided if the natural mother was able to see her son
and be involved in his upbringing.
Uncontested divorce, an extra-judicial process unique to
Japan, is possible with just the signatures of the divorcing parties. But
because this process does not consider child custody or visitation rights, there
are many parents in Japan that are unable to see their own children. Neither are
there are any official marriage counseling centers in Japan. Arbitrations and
trial proceeding only superficially settle custody and financial issues, and
give little regard to child welfare. In about 80% of Japanese divorces, the wife
wins the custody battle (MOJ statistics). Almost half of divorced fathers are
cut off from their sons and daughters.
Arbitrations and trials are inclined to value the maintenance
of the “current status”, which leads to “the person who grabs the kids first
wins”. This causes a painful repetition of “child abduction” between
Japanese couples. We at Fathers’ Website have been receiving an
increasing number of similar reports saying, “While I was at work, my wife
suddenly left me and returned to her parents’ house taking our child. Then she
sued me with a cooked up domestic violence scheme and I can’t see my child
anymore.
In 1994, Japan ratified the United Nations, “Convention on
the Rights of the Child”. But the above cases demonstrate that this convention
is not always applied in Japan. Furthermore, there are blatant contradictions
between the convention and Japanese Parental Law, where the convention ensures
that “a child shall not be separated from his or here parents against their
will”.
Case 1 (Father)
While I was at work, my wife left me and returned to her
parents’, taking my 9-month-old son. She faked DV (domestic violence) stories,
entered a DV shelter, and retained a lawyer. I was shocked to receive the
arbitration subpoena. I visited her parents’ only to be sworn at by her mother.
My wife and her mother hated that my son took to me. During arbitration, my wife
and her lawyer demanded that I divorce her and give up child custody if I ever
wanted to see my son again. The court advised her to allow me to see my son, but
she has refused to do so for a year. The court seems to have given up, for there
is no law to enforce visitation.
I cannot believe that child abduction is not a crime in
Japan, and that lawyers can use a child as a “tool” for divorce. I am afraid
that my son will grow up and not recognize his father. I hear that depriving
children the love of a parent could give them severe personality disorders. This
worries me so much.
Case 2 (Mother)
In Oct 1999, I gained the custody of my 1-year-old son after
an uncontested divorce. But soon after, my ex-husband grabbed my son. Family
Court, High Court, Supreme Court…in all the courts I “legally” won the judgment
that my son be returned to me. But I “virtually” lost, for the current law has
no way to contest my ex-spouse’s rejection. Being the child’s real mother with
custody, why can’t I at least see my son, let alone live with him? I could have
taken him away myself, but what is the use of repeating “child abduction? It
only hurts the child”. I finally gave up custody in exchange for periodic
visitations…but the child’s father continues to deny me visits. I am now
appealing for visitation through arbitration, but the defendant always fails to
appear in the family court, which is not punishable by law. I can’t even
negotiate. I hope that one day, every child will be blessed with the love of
“both” parents.
Case 3 (Father)
I am a divorced father living apart from my son. The Family
Court stipulated the child support and visitation schedule in the arbitration
record. After the divorce, I was to be able to see my son 6 times a year. My
ex-wife however, has refused my visitations since February 2001. I appealed for
visitation through arbitration in Family Court again, and was denied twice. But
my ex-wife remains stubborn, and for no legitimate reason, stands in the way of
father-child interaction. One year has passed since I claimed damages in
District Court, but as of now there is still no decision. I wonder when Japan
will become an advanced society where parents and children are able freely
communicate with each other.
“Fathers” Website”
Father's Website is a Japanese non-profit organization
working to modify the Japanese Civil Code to conform to the UN Convention on
Children's Rights. In particular we support the enactment of joint custody
and visitation policies. We provide emotional support and information to anyone
in Japan who is being denied contact with his or her children. In addition to
fathers, our members include left-behind mothers and custodial parents.
url: http://www.fatherswebsite.com/
e-mail: world_info@fatherswebsite.com tel: 03-5475-8207
|